/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Monday, June 17, 2013

UPTET / Allahabad HC : Candidate Obtained 82/150 marks i.e. 54.67% and demand rounding of 54.67 should be treated as 55%

UPTET / Allahabad HC : Candidate Obtained 82/150 marks i.e. 54.67% and demand rounding of 54.67 should be treated as 55%, And due to reserved category he should be considered as pass

Court Suggested - Approach to NCTE


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?A.F.R.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30875 of 2013

Petitioner :- Jaswant Saini And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- Basic Shiksha Adhikari And 5 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- J.S.Pandey,V.Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Chaubey for the respondent No.1 and Sri Awadhesh Kumar for the respondent No.2.
The petitioners have all qualified the Central Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education. They belong to the Other Backward Caste Category. They have obtained 82 marks out of 150. Consequently, the percentage of their marks works out to be 54.67. 
According to the guidelines framed by the National Council for Teacher Education on 11.2.2011 read with the clarification issued on 1.4.2011, a candidate appearing in the test will be treated to have passed the test provided he scores 60% or more marks in the test. This percentage is reduced by 5% in relation to the reserved category candidates.

The purpose of providing these minimum marks have been indicated in clause 9 of the Notification dated 11.2.2011. It provides that even in the recruitment process weightage has to be given to the TET scores. 

The petitioners contend that they have been declared to have passed the CTET with only 82 marks and, therefore, according to the U.P. Basic Education Teachers Service Rules, 1981, they should be treated to be eligible as they possess the essential qualification of Teacher Eligibility Test.

However, the forms for applying to the post of Assistant Teacher which have to be uploaded on online basis, for which the last date is today, the minimum marks required for the reserved category candidate is indicated as 83 out of 150 which is 55.43%. 
Sri V. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends that if the petitioners have been declared to have qualified the Teacher Eligibility Test conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education, then such eligibility should also be included in respect of such candidates, who have obtained 82 marks out of 150. He submits that there can be no discrimination, as the percentage of the petitioner which is 54.67% should be read as 55%. 
He contends that no candidate can obtain any fraction of marks because every question has one mark allotted in the answer-book. Consequently, if a candidate gets 82.6 marks, then only he will be able to score 55% and, therefore, on account of this anomaly existing, the Central Board of Secondary Education took a decision to treat such candidates to have qualified, who have obtained 82 marks. The reasons appears to be that no candidate can get half a mark or any fraction as on evaluation one gets full one marks or none. Thus, the CBSE which is the examining body has treated 82/150 = 54.67% as the pass percentage to qualify in the examination. Sri Singh, therefore, submits that the same criteria should be adopted by the State of U.P. while offering appointment to Assistant Teachers under the 1981 Rules.
Having considered the aforesaid submissions raised, primarily this is an issue of policy which has to be decided by the National Council for Teacher Education and it does not fall within the authority of the Central Board of Secondary Education to give any such decision in relation to calculation.
The reason is very simple inasmuch the National Council for Teacher Education is the Academic Authority defined and entitled to lay down the norms of minimum qualifications as per Section 23 of the the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The power, therefore, vests in the Academic Authority and not in the Central Board of Secondary Education.
There is nothing on record to indicate that the National Council for Teacher Education has considered this anomaly to be read in favour of the petitioners. In such a situation, the petitioners ought to have approached the National Council for Teacher Education for the redressal of their grievances. 
I am not inclined to issue any mandamus as prayed for in view of the fact that the existing norms clearly require the possession of 55% or more marks in relation to the reserved category candidates. The score of 82 out of 150 does not amount to 55% or more and the principles of rounding off will not be available in view of the fact that the prescription in clause 9 of the guidelines dated 11.2.2011 clearly recites, the minimum percentage or more as the score, which has to be obtained by a candidate. In such circumstances, less than 55% is not contemplated therein.
Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to records with liberty to the petitioners to approach the National Council for Teacher Education for any such clarification. 
Order Date :- 29.5.2013 
Irshad

45 comments:

  1. JAIL WAALI KE LIYE
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .




    Aankhon mein rehne wale ko yaad
    nahi karte,Dil mein rehne wale ki
    baat nahi karte,Hamari to ROOH me
    bas gaye ho aap,Tabhi to milne ki
    FARIYAD nahi karte.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mere Pyaare Mitron UP Govt Ne
    UPTET 2013 Mein Achchha Result
    Dene Ki Taiyyari Ker Li Hai Jismein
    Fail Hone Waale Abhaage Honge Fir
    Bhi Unki Sankhyaa UP Board K
    Intermediate Mein Fail Hone Waalon
    Se Kam Hogi. Apne Hi District Mein
    Centre Hone Ka Faayda Jyaada Se
    Jyaada Log Prapt Ker Sakenge. Jin
    Logon Ko Sirf Iss Exam Ko Pass
    Kerke Job Turant Milni Hogi Wo
    Lakshmi Ji K Saath Jugaad Lagaana
    Shuru Ker Chuke Honge. Jitne Jyaada
    Log Pass Honge Utne He Jyaada
    Aapas Mein Gaali Deker Ladne Waale
    Groups Banenge UPTET 2011 Ki
    Tarah Aur Ek Doosre Ki Maan Tatha
    Bahen Ko Gaaliyon Se Vibhooshit
    Karenge Aur Govt Ko Khush Kerenge
    Aur Aisi Govt Ko Aur Chaahiye He
    Kya ?.

    ReplyDelete
  3. yeh sarkar to
    atankvadiyo ko bhi jail se
    bahar karna chahti
    muslimo ko khush karne
    ke liye lekin court ne
    unhe aisa karne se rok
    diya ab to tum jaan gaye
    honge ki sarkar ki taquat
    badi hai ya court ki agar
    ve atankvadi chhot jaate
    to tum ya koi bhi chain ki
    neend na so pata phir
    kahan gayi sarkar ki
    taquat aur tum kahte ho
    ki base of selection tay
    karne ka adhikar sarkar
    ko hota hai to mayavati
    sarkar ne jis samay tet
    merit se ghosna ki thi tab
    wo kya sarkar nahin
    thi????

    ReplyDelete
  4. BTC AUR VBTC
    KO CHHOD DIYA JAYE TO
    KAHIN PAR BHI AISE
    VYAVASTA NAHIN JAHAN
    PAR ACADEMIC KI BASE
    PAR SELECTION HOTA HAI
    CHAHE KISI BHI JOB KE
    SELECTION KO UTAKAR
    DEKH LO PHIR JAB AAP
    ITNE BADE ACADEMIC KE
    SAMARTHAK HO TO UN
    SELECTION COMMITTEES
    KO BHI ACADEMIC MERIT
    KE FAAYDE BATA DO KYA
    JAANE VE BHI APKI
    BAATO SE SANTUSHT
    HOKAR IAS/ PCS JAISE
    EXAMS MEIN PRE/MANIS/
    INTERVIEWS KE ESTHAN
    PAR ACADEMIC BASE PAR
    HI IAS/PCS BANANA
    SHURU KAR DE.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AAP LOG
    KAHTE HAI KI PAHLE
    ACADEMIC MERIT KE
    AADHAR PAR SELECTION
    HOTE THE APKI BAAT
    BILKUL SAHI HAI KINTU
    PAHLE TET MERIT KI
    VYAVASTHA NAHIN THI
    AUR GOVT KE PASS EK
    MATRA VIKALP ACADEMIC
    MERIT THA KINTU AB TET
    KE ANIVARYA HO JAANE
    SE TEACHER SELECTION
    KA EK ACHCHA VIKALP AA
    GAYA HAI JISSE UTTAM
    TEACHERS DESH KO
    MILENGE TRIPLE BENCH
    KE JUDGES NE BHI KAHA
    HAI KI TET MERIT KE
    WEIGHAGE KO KOI BHI
    RAJYA SARKAR ANDEKHA
    NAHIN KAR SAKTI HAI
    VAISE BHI YEH MAMLA
    DOUBLE BENCH MEIN
    VICHARDHIN HAI AUR
    JUDGES HUMSE JYADA
    KANOON KE BAARE MEIN
    JANTE HAI LEKIN MAIN EK
    BAAT SPAST KARNA
    CHAHOONGA KI JAB KOI
    ACHCHA PRODUCT AATA
    HAI TO SAB LOG USKO
    APNA LETE HAI JAISE
    PAHLE BAAT KARNE KE
    LIYE LANDLINE PHONE KA
    USE KARTE THE AAJ
    MOBILE KA USE KARTE
    HAI KOI YEH NAHIN
    KAHTA HAI KI BHAI
    PAHLE TO HUM
    LANDLINE KA USE KARTE
    THE HUM TO USI KA USE
    KARENGE MOBILE KA USE
    NAHIN KARENGE
    AUR.ACADEMIC MERIT KI
    SABSE BADI KAMI YAH
    HAI KI YAH SABHI
    BOARDS/UNIVERSITIES/
    SYLLABUS/MARKING
    PATTERN AADI KI DHYAN
    MEIN RAKHE BINA SABKO
    EK HI TARAJOO MEIN TOL
    DETI HAI .

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kisi bhi merit ke hazar
    baar jay karne se kuchh
    nahin hoga kyoki triple
    bench ke 52 page ke
    faisle mein page 43 ko
    dhyan se study karo to
    tumhe judges ke rujhaano
    ka pata chal jayega
    unhone saaf kaha ki ncte
    ki guidelines mein tet ko
    weightage dene ki baat
    kahi gayi hai to koi bhi
    rajya sarkaar usko undeka
    nahin kar sakti hai is baat
    ke kya maayne hai aap
    khud hi andaja laga sakte
    ho vaise bhi harkauli ji ke
    stay ka aadhar bhi base
    of selection ko lekar laga
    hai kyonki unka manna
    that ki agar koi nai sarkar
    ka gathan hota to wo
    manchahe tarike se base
    of selection change nahin
    kar sakti hai ab to aap
    sab academic samarthak
    bandu samajh hi gaye
    honge ki kon si merit se
    selection hona tay hai.

    ReplyDelete
  7. NYAY SE BADKAR KOI
    BHI SARKAR NAHIN
    SANJAY DUTT KO
    BACHANE KE LIYE
    POLITICAL LEADERS NE
    NICHE TAK KE JOR LAGA
    LIYE MAGAR KYA HUA JAIL
    KI HAWA KHA RAHA
    HAI...USI PARKAR SE
    SACH KO JHOOT NAHIN
    BANAYA JA SAKTA HAI
    NCTE KI GUIDELINES
    MEIN SAAF SAAF LIKHA
    HAI KI SELECTION
    AUTHORITY KO
    RECRUITMENE KE SAMAY
    TET KA WEIGHTAGE DIYA
    JAANA CHAYIE TO KOI BHI
    GOVT KI ITNI TAQAT
    NAHI KI WO IN
    GUIDELINES KO ANDEKHA NAHI
    KAR SAKE ISLIYE JAB BHARTI HOGI TET MERIT PAR HI HOGI .
    JAY HIND
    JAT TET
    JAI BHARAT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UMADEV JI mai aapki baaton ko manta hu aur apka sachcha samarthak bhi hoon.Such me aap dev hi hai.

      Delete
  8. Umadev kyo hat kar rahe ho tb ka order dekho

    ReplyDelete
  9. RAHUL savita
    ................... apni maa Bahan ka vardnn karna chhod de uske liye aur log hain unko bhi mauqa milna chahiye .

    ReplyDelete
  10. tet pass candidate ka acd aadhar par selection ka virodh karane wale bhi acchi
    taqrah janate hain ki brastachar ujagar hone ke baad tet merit ke aadhar per selection
    nahi ho sakata ekin we apne khud ke swarth ke liye ye nahi chahate ki prt ki bharti ho
    isliye aise logo se sawadhan,bharti kaise bhi ho tet uttirne hi isme samil honge,
    hamara main maksad prt ki bharti ko start karawane se hona chahiye.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Is samay tet merit se bharti ki mang karane wale log non tet wale hai ve janate hai ki agar prakiya badalati hai to bharti puri nahi ho payegi , jab bharti tet merit se ho rahi thi to ye log acd ki bat kar rahe the . Bharti acd se huyi hai ,hogi aur hoti rahegi is saty ko koi jhutala nahi sakata

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bharti jaise bhi ho,start hone do.Aapas me gaali-galauj karne se kya fayda?
    Ye log Loksabha chunav tak kisi tarah bharti ko rokna chahte hai,uske bad bharti cancle kar denge.
    Mai 35 Hajar Rupye ka chalan banvaya hu.
    TET me 94 marks aur Merit 57.5 hai.
    Reply bandhu.....

    ReplyDelete
  13. khuda kare ki duplicate ka maqsad pura ho.


    aur abhi brashtachaar saabit nahi ho payaa hai.

    agar saabit bhi huwa to good part aur bad part waali baat hona tay hai.

    ReplyDelete
  14. jab koi pareshaan hota hai ya niraas hota hai ya apni haar dekhai dene legti hai to vo....
    1-saamne bale ke baat ko galat batata hai.
    2-bhonkna suru kr deta hai.
    3-or jub eski koi nahi sunta tb galeia dene lugeta hai.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ajeet patel. Agar sarkar ko tet ya merit se bharti karane me dikkat hai to vo samvida par takh de 10000 rupye me har school par jab HC ka faisla ayega tab dekha jata jo b.ed vale btc vale bekar ghum rahe to usake parivar vale to khush rahte etna paisa laga ke b.ed jo ksrvaye hai

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mai aapki baaton se sehmat hoo.
      Sarkar ko chahiye ki 10000/month sanvida par rakhe.

      Delete
  16. SAVDHAN SAVDHAN SAVDHAN
    is maansun ke baad tet merit ka
    jordar tufan aane ki prabal
    sambhvna....is tufan me acd
    samrthak or unke aakawo ke ud jane
    ka andesa.....agr un logo ko is
    tufaan se bachna hai to tet ki saran
    me aa sakte hai....tet samrthak unko
    apni saran me lene ke liye taiyar
    hai.....jai tet jai old ad j

    ReplyDelete
  17. Tujh sy bicher gyi to marr jaungi..
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Kuch Aisey hi thy waady tere...

    ReplyDelete
  18. hum us mansoon k welcome karne ko tayer hai
    umadev g/tmntbbn.

    ReplyDelete
  19. hum us mansoon k welcome karne ko tayer hai
    umadev g/tmntbbn.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Kaun aisa h jo umadevji ka need aur chain chura liya h please yar bata do na hume bhi..

    ReplyDelete
  21. लाखो टेट के फॉर्म निरस्त लेकिन क्यों,, ये फॉर्म भरते समय स्वीकार क्यों किये गए,,, सिर्फ फीस इक्कठ्ठा करने के लिए,, लेकिन अभी भी बहुत कुछ होना बाकी है,, पढ़िए ये खबर 4 दिसम्बर 2011 दैनिक जागरण इलाहबाद में प्रकाशित,, क्या ये लोग फिर से कोर्ट जायेंगे या फिर पूर्व का फैसला मान्य होगा,,,,.......

    ******जवाब मिला, पर जब हजारों हो गए बाहर*******
    Dec 04, 08:28 pm
    वरिष्ठ संवाददाता, इलाहाबाद : माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद द्वारा 13 नवंबर को ली गई शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा की विज्ञप्ति में अस्पष्टता के कारण हजारों बीएड अभ्यर्थी परीक्षा से बाहर हो गए। अभ्यर्थी यूपी बोर्ड के अधिकारियों से पूछते रहे कि एमए के आधार पर बीएड करने वाले अभ्यर्थी टीईटी क्यों नहीं दे सकते, पर इसका कोई जवाब नहीं मिला, जबकि एनसीटीई ने माना है कि स्नातक या स्नातकोत्तर में 45 प्रतिशत अंक पाने वाले अभ्यर्थी शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा दे सकते हैं।
    दरअसल, इलाहाबाद हाईकोट में मनीष कुमार सिंह द्वारा विशेष अपील 2076 , 2011 की है। याची के स्नातक में 43 प्रतिशत अंक हैं और उसने परास्नातक के आधार पर बीएड किया है। यूपीटीईटी की विज्ञप्ति में न्यूनतम योग्यता स्नातक में 45 प्रतिशत होना अनिवार्य था, ऐसे में हजारों ऐसे अभ्यर्थी, जिन्होंने परास्नातक के आधार पर बीएड किया था वे टीईटी की दौड़ से बाहर हो गए। याची के अधिवक्ता ने एनसीटीई से पूछा था कि आखिर वास्तविक स्थिति क्या है। इसके जवाब में एनसीटीई के अधिवक्ता ने कहा कि टीईटी देने के लिए ऐसे अभ्यर्थी पात्र हैं, जिनके स्नातक या स्नात्कोत्तर में 45 प्रतिशत अंक हैं। स्थिति स्पष्ट होने से एमए के आधार पर बीएड करने वाले अभ्यर्थी अपने को ठगा सा महसूस कर रहे हैं। अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि माध्यमिक शिक्षा परिषद की छोटी सी गलती के कारण हजारों छात्रों का भविष्य अंधकार में है। दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण है कि एनसीटीई द्वारा भी यह जानकारी तब दी गई जब यह मामला कोर्ट में गया। अभ्यर्थियों ने एनसीटीई को भी इस संबंध में पत्र लिखकर जानना चाहा था कि उन्हें टीईटी में क्यों नहीं भाग लेने दिया जा रहा है, जिसका कोई जवाब नहीं दिया गया। अभ्यर्थियों का कहना है कि उनके मानसिक व भावनात्मक उत्पीड़न के लिए आखिर कौन जिम्मेदार है?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Game ka niyam game suru hone se
    pahle banta hai.
    so 72825 pad jise b.sp. govt. ne
    n.c.t.e. se permission lekar srajit
    kiya aur base of selection tet marit
    rakkha nhi badal sakta aur bharti
    old add ki sart pe hi hogi. haan agar
    akal less base badalna chahe to
    unhe nye pad srajit karne honge.

    ReplyDelete
  23. सरकार को सद्बुद्धि मिलने से तो रही ईश्वर हमारे वकीलों को सद्बुद्धि दे ताकि वे कोई नया शिगूफा छेड़ने की बजाय ब्रहद पीठ के आदेश के प्रकाश मे हरकौली जी से आदेश देने की प्रार्थना करे और यह मामला यहीं समाप्त हो ।

    ReplyDelete
  24. उत्तर प्रदेश में एक नई तरह की राजनीति इन दिनों पनप रही है, क्योंकि सपा सरकार जनहित की आड़ में आतंकवादियों, खूंखार अपराधियों, बलात्कारियों, हत्यारों और लुटेरों के ख़िलाफ़ चल रहे मुक़दमे बंद कराने की साज़िश में लगी है. इतना ही नहीं, समाजवादी पार्टी से जुड़े क़रीब तीन हज़ार लोगों के ख़िलाफ़भी विभिन्न धाराओं में चल रहे आपराधिक मुक़दमों को वापस लेने के लिए पेपर वर्क शुरू हो गया है. इनमें से कुछ के ख़िलाफ़ भले ही पिछली मायावती सरकार ने पक्षपातपूर्ण तरी़के से मुक़दमे ठोंक दिए थे,लेकिन अधिकांश लोगों की छवि साफ़-सुथरी नहीं रही है. हालांकि सपा नेतृत्व को अब यही लगता है कि आतंकवादियों पर दायर मुक़दमे हटाकर वह मुसलमानों का वोट हासिल कर सकती है. इतना ही नहीं, सपा सरकार ब्राह्मणों को लुभाने के लिए बसपा राज में इन पर दर्ज किए गए एससी/एसटी के मुकदमों से छूट देने की बात कर रही है, तो ठाकुरों को ख़ुश करने के लिए पूर्व मंत्री और बाहुबली नेता रघुराज प्रताप सिंह उर्फ राजा भैया जैसे कई क्षत्रिय नेताओं के ख़िलाफ़चल रहे मुक़दमे बंद करने की पहल भी कर चुकी है.

    ReplyDelete
  25. lestest news tet ko wintage milne ki ummed lagane walo ko dhere ka jhtka jor se lga..... prt me 10800 pado par acd merit se bhari gayi.....

    ReplyDelete
  26. tet merit ki mang karne wale total chutia aur naklchi hai, mai prove kr sakta hu........ aakhir jb GIC me gunak se bharti hui to inhone koi aaptti court me nahi dayar ki par ab prt me tet me nakl krk tet merit ki mang krk apne ko yogy kahte hai....... isse ye prove hota hai k ye total chutia logo ki fauz hai......... agar inme talent hota to pahle ye GIC me gunak banne se rokte.......

    ReplyDelete
  27. samajwadi parti jindabad....... mulam singh yadav jindabad....... akhilesh yadav jindabad....... kapil dev yadav jindabad...... acd merit jindabad.......

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ye kya chakkar hai bhi.......ek hath me 2-2 partiyo ke jhande.sahi hai.....aaj ke waqt ki ye hi maang hai tet merit nahin to bharti bhi nahin.....!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  29. ye tet merit nahi to bharti nahi sab ko bewkoof bana rha hai, ye ek hi hai, ye pagal ho chuka hai.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anamika meet to any doctor because you are becomes mad.

    ReplyDelete
  31. anamika G
    ........... meri aapko ye salaah hai ki aap fir se B.ed karo

    ReplyDelete
  32. mr. TMNTBBN(duplicate)
    hume aage ki bhartiyon se matlab nahi hai chahe to govt. rikshaw waalon ki bharti kare.
    aap apni news ka source den
    aur apni spelling theek karen

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anamika Ji dhayan se dekhen.
    (i) g+ Yani TET MERIT NAHI TO BHARTI BHI NAHI(Original)
    (ii) e yani TET MERIT NAHI TO BHARTI BHI NAHI(duplicate)

    ReplyDelete
  34. उत्कर्ष जी धन्यवाद

    ReplyDelete
  35. उत्कर्ष जी धन्यवाद

    ReplyDelete
  36. Mere question ka javab nhi diya aapne please reply me.tmntbbn g

    ReplyDelete
  37. yogita bali(zindgi zee) naam tha uska.
    .
    .
    .jine marne ki qasme khayi(1996).
    .
    .
    fir usne zindgi se hi naata tod liya(1999)

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  39. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Dear TET frndz !
    Aap sab kaise hain ?
    Aaj hum aap ko kuchh aur bhi important information batana chaahenge !
    ***********************************************************
    High Court ne waise to lagbhag sabhi poits par nirnay de diya hai (Base of selection TET Vs Gudaank ko chhor kar)aur lagbhag sabhi doosri Yaachikaaen khaarij kar di hain un me se kuchh very important hum aap sab ko batana chahenge -----
    1- OBC cnddt ke 82/150 marks hone par bhi (54.67%) ko 55% maanne ki yaachika khaarij. Ye cnddts bharti ke liye ahar nahi !
    2- TET IInd paper qualified cnddts ko Primary me bharti ke liye ahar maanne ki yachika khaarij. (Ist paper qlfy hona chahiye , IInd paper wale kewal Junior ki vacancies me hi ja sakte hai )
    3- NTT(Nursery teacher training) wale cnddts ko bharti me shamil karne ki yaachika khaarij.
    4- 2011 me training poori kar chuke cnddts ki TET me na baithne aur vigyapan radd karne ki yaachika khaarij

    (July ka intezar kijiye dosto aur dua kijiye k hum sab ki bhi councelling jald ho)
    *********************************************************************************
    shad8762@gmail.com(FACEBOOK).......cntct - 09307476428 (plz don't call , if u wanna say something u can SMS )

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।